Adjuvant therapy with pembrolizumab in renal cell carcinoma: real-world experiences from a retrospective, multi-institutional cohort

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Angelika Mattigk - , Universitätsklinikum Ulm (Autor:in)
  • Cristina Cano Garcia - , Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt (Autor:in)
  • Niklas Klümper - , Universitätsklinikum Bonn (Autor:in)
  • Alexander Cox - , Universitätsklinikum Bonn (Autor:in)
  • Oliver Hahn - , Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (Autor:in)
  • Kerstin Junker - , Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes (Autor:in)
  • Kati Erdmann - , Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie (Autor:in)
  • Philipp Schmucker - , Universitätsklinikum Freiburg (Autor:in)
  • Luka Flegar - , Philipps-Universität Marburg (Autor:in)
  • Friedemann Zengerling - , Universitätsklinikum Ulm (Autor:in)
  • Severine Banek - , Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt (Autor:in)
  • Jörg Ellinger - , Universitätsklinikum Bonn (Autor:in)
  • Bjoern Thorben Buerk - , Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie (Autor:in)
  • Johannes Huber - , Philipps-Universität Marburg (Autor:in)
  • Charis Kalogirou - , Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (Autor:in)
  • Philip Zeuschner - , Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes (Gemeinsame:r Letztautor:in)
  • Benedikt Hoeh - , Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt (Gemeinsame:r Letztautor:in)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients at high risk of recurrence following nephrectomy in KEYNOTE-564 trial (NCT03142334). The objective of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of adjuvant pembrolizumab in a real-world setting.

METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective study, RCC patients receiving adjuvant pembrolizumab between 01/22 and 10/23 at seven tertiary referral centers were included. DFS and treatment safety were assessed.

RESULTS: 52 patients with RCC were included. 24 (46%), 5 (9.6 %), 22 (42%) and 1 (1.9%) patients were classified as intermediate to high risk (IR to HR), high risk (HR), M1 with no evidence of disease (M1NED) and unknown. At a median follow-up of 6 months, DFS rates at 6 months were 64.2% in the overall cohort. In subgroup analyses, M1NED patients demonstrated significantly lower DFS compared to non-metastatic (combined: IR to HR/ HR) patients (log rank: p=0.025). Regarding toxicity, grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 26% of patients. Treatment discontinuations were reported in 20% of the patients.

CONCLUSION: Recurrence rates in the M1NED group remained high and occurred earlier in our real-world compared to KEYNOTE-564. Long-term toxicities were comparable to clinical trials data.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)291-298
Seitenumfang8
FachzeitschriftUrologia internationalis
Jahrgang109
Ausgabenummer3
Frühes Online-Datum24 Dez. 2024
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 1 Juni 2025
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

ORCID /0000-0003-3717-3637/work/176343564
unpaywall 10.1159/000543278
Mendeley 185c125c-8335-37fd-9626-442b59b2c331
Scopus 85217576653

Schlagworte

Schlagwörter

  • Adjuvant therapy, Immunotherapy, Real-world data, Renal cell carcinoma