Adding cetuximab to paclitaxel and carboplatin for first-line treatment of carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP): results of the Phase 2 AIO trial PACET-CUP

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO) - CUP Group - (Autor:in)
  • Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I
  • Universitäts PalliativCentrum (UPC)
  • Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden
  • Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE)
  • oho! ostholstein-onkologie
  • KEM | Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte gGmbH
  • Universitätsklinikum Essen
  • MVZ Mitte
  • Leibniz Universität Hannover (LUH)
  • Universitätsmedizin Mannheim
  • Marienhospital
  • SRH University Heidelberg

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) have a dismal prognosis, even when treated with multi-agent chemotherapy. We hypothesised that adding the epidermal growth-factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor cetuximab to standard first-line chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin would improve PFS and RR in unfavourable CUP.

METHODS: This open-labelled, multicentre Phase 2 study included patients with unfavourable, untreated adeno- or undifferentiated CUP. Patients were randomised to receive either paclitaxel/carboplatin (group A) or paclitaxel/carboplatin plus cetuximab (group B) every 3 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles followed by cetuximab maintenance in group B. The primary endpoint was PFS in the two groups. Secondary endpoints were RR, toxicity and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS: One-hundred-and-fifty patients were randomised (group A = 72, group B = 78). The median PFS and OS for all patients were 3.8 and 8.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.9-4.8 and 6.8-9.5). There was no significant difference in PFS (3.7 vs 4.6 months, HR 0.98) or OS (8.1 vs 7.4, HR 1.1) between the two treatment groups. Response rate tended to be better for chemotherapy plus cetuximab compared to chemotherapy alone (22% vs 15%). Adverse events grade ≥3 were comparable between the two groups, except for significantly increased skin toxicity in the cetuximab arm.

CONCLUSIONS: Cetuximab plus paclitaxel/carboplatin did not improve PFS, OS and RR in metastatic CUP compared to paclitaxel/carboplatin alone. Addition of cetuximab resulted in additional skin toxicity.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00894569.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)721-727
Seitenumfang7
FachzeitschriftBritish journal of cancer
Jahrgang124
Ausgabenummer4
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Feb. 2021
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

PubMedCentral PMC7884392
Scopus 85096556979
ORCID /0000-0002-9321-9911/work/142251959

Schlagworte

Schlagwörter

  • Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects, Carboplatin/administration & dosage, Cetuximab/administration & dosage, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Unknown Primary/drug therapy, Paclitaxel/administration & dosage, Progression-Free Survival, Survival Rate