Accelerated vs. conventionally fractionated postoperative radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer—final results of the prematurely terminated PORTAF trial
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Forschungsartikel › Beigetragen › Begutachtung
Beitragende
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK) - Dresden
Abstract
Purpose: A prolonged overall treatment time (OTT) has been demonstrated to adversely affect the primary radiation therapy (RT) outcome in various solid tumors, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Retrospective data from our group suggested an advantage of shorter OTT also for postoperative RT (PORT) in patients with NSCLC. The PORTAF trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02189967) was initiated to prospectively test this hypothesis. Methods: The multicenter prospective randomized phase II trial in patients with NSCLC investigated whether an accelerated schedule of PORT (7 fractions per week, 2 Gy per fraction, OTT 3.5–4 weeks) improved outcome compared to conventional fractionation (5 fractions per week, 2 Gy per fraction, OTT 5–6 weeks). Target volumes and total radiation doses were stratified in both treatment arms based on individual risk factors. Primary endpoint of the study was locoregional tumor control (LRTC) 36 months after PORT, with 154 patients to be included in each arm. Results: Due to slow accrual and changed indications for PORT, we prematurely closed the trial in 2019. Between 2014 and 2019, eight recruiting centers included 27 evaluable patients. An interim safety analysis performed for the first 21 patients showed nonsignificant differences regarding grade 3 toxicities between the treatment arms, thus not meeting the termination criteria. LRTC was not significantly different between accelerated (73%) and conventionally fractionated RT (92%; p = 0.535). Noteworthily, in 21 FDG-PET/CT restagings before RT, an unexpectedly high number of locoregional recurrences (n = 4) and distant metastases (n = 2) were seen, resulting in changed treatment intentions for these patients. Conclusion: The prematurely closed PORTAF trial did not find significant differences in 3‑year LRTC when comparing accelerated versus conventionally fractionated irradiation. The observed additional benefit of FDG-PET/CT restaging prior to PORT should be further investigated in a larger cohort to optimize patient selection and avoid unnecessary side-effects.
Details
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Fachzeitschrift | Strahlentherapie und Onkologie |
| Publikationsstatus | Angenommen/Im Druck - 2025 |
| Peer-Review-Status | Ja |
Schlagworte
Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
Schlagwörter
- Fractionation, Non-small-cell lung cancer, Overall treatment time, Positron-emission tomography, Postoperative radiotherapy