A Delphi consensus statement for digital surgery

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Kyle Lam - , Imperial College London (Autor:in)
  • Michael D. Abràmoff - , University of Iowa (Autor:in)
  • José M. Balibrea - , Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona (Autor:in)
  • Steven M. Bishop - , CMR Surgical (Autor:in)
  • Richard R. Brady - , Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (Autor:in)
  • Rachael A. Callcut - , University of California at Davis (Autor:in)
  • Manish Chand - , University College London (Autor:in)
  • Justin W. Collins - , CMR Surgical, University College London (Autor:in)
  • Markus K. Diener - , Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg (Autor:in)
  • Matthias Eisenmann - , Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) (Autor:in)
  • Kelly Fermont - (Autor:in)
  • Manoel Galvao Neto - , Endovitta Institute, Fundação Universitaria do ABC, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (Autor:in)
  • Gregory D. Hager - , Johns Hopkins University (Autor:in)
  • Robert J. Hinchliffe - , University of Bristol (Autor:in)
  • Alan Horgan - , Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (Autor:in)
  • Pierre Jannin - , Université de Rennes 1 (Autor:in)
  • Alexander Langerman - , Vanderbilt University, University of Toronto (Autor:in)
  • Kartik Logishetty - , Imperial College London (Autor:in)
  • Amit Mahadik - , Stryker Corporation (Autor:in)
  • Lena Maier-Hein - , Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Universität Heidelberg, University of Toronto (Autor:in)
  • Esteban Martín Antona - , Hospital Clínico San Carlos de Madrid (Autor:in)
  • Pietro Mascagni - , Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, Université de Strasbourg (Autor:in)
  • Ryan K. Mathew - , University of Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (Autor:in)
  • Beat P. Müller-Stich - , Universität Heidelberg, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) (Autor:in)
  • Thomas Neumuth - , Universität Leipzig (Autor:in)
  • Felix Nickel - , Universität Heidelberg (Autor:in)
  • Adrian Park - , Johns Hopkins University (Autor:in)
  • Gianluca Pellino - , Universita della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Autonomous University of Barcelona (Autor:in)
  • Frank Rudzicz - , University of Toronto, Vector Institute, Unity Health Toronto, Surgical Safety Technologies Inc. (Autor:in)
  • Sam Shah - , Ulster University (Autor:in)
  • Mark Slack - , CMR Surgical, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Cambridge (Autor:in)
  • Myles J. Smith - , Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Institute of Cancer Research (Autor:in)
  • Naeem Soomro - , Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (Autor:in)
  • Stefanie Speidel - , Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen (Partner: UKD, MFD, HZDR, DKFZ), Exzellenzcluster CeTI: Zentrum für Taktiles Internet (Autor:in)
  • Danail Stoyanov - , University College London (Autor:in)
  • Henry S. Tilney - , Imperial College London, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust (Autor:in)
  • Martin Wagner - , Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Nationales Zentrum für Tumorerkrankungen (NCT) Heidelberg (Autor:in)
  • Ara Darzi - , Imperial College London (Autor:in)
  • James M. Kinross - , Imperial College London (Autor:in)
  • Sanjay Purkayastha - , Imperial College London (Autor:in)
  • University of Iowa

Abstract

The use of digital technology is increasing rapidly across surgical specialities, yet there is no consensus for the term ‘digital surgery’. This is critical as digital health technologies present technical, governance, and legal challenges which are unique to the surgeon and surgical patient. We aim to define the term digital surgery and the ethical issues surrounding its clinical application, and to identify barriers and research goals for future practice. 38 international experts, across the fields of surgery, AI, industry, law, ethics and policy, participated in a four-round Delphi exercise. Issues were generated by an expert panel and public panel through a scoping questionnaire around key themes identified from the literature and voted upon in two subsequent questionnaire rounds. Consensus was defined if >70% of the panel deemed the statement important and <30% unimportant. A final online meeting was held to discuss consensus statements. The definition of digital surgery as the use of technology for the enhancement of preoperative planning, surgical performance, therapeutic support, or training, to improve outcomes and reduce harm achieved 100% consensus agreement. We highlight key ethical issues concerning data, privacy, confidentiality and public trust, consent, law, litigation and liability, and commercial partnerships within digital surgery and identify barriers and research goals for future practice. Developers and users of digital surgery must not only have an awareness of the ethical issues surrounding digital applications in healthcare, but also the ethical considerations unique to digital surgery. Future research into these issues must involve all digital surgery stakeholders including patients.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer100
Seitenumfang9
Fachzeitschrift npj digital medicine
Jahrgang5
Ausgabenummer1
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 19 Juli 2022
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

Scopus 85134423864
PubMed 35854145
Mendeley cce82473-8066-3873-bf4e-549eb004e5ab
unpaywall 10.1038/s41746-022-00641-6

Schlagworte

Bibliotheksschlagworte