5-year randomized multicenter clinical trial on single dental implants placed in the midline of the edentulous mandible

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Matthias Kern - , Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (CAU) (Autor:in)
  • Christoph Behrendt - , Universitätsklinikum Greifswald (Autor:in)
  • Elfriede Fritzer - , Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (CAU) (Autor:in)
  • Ralf J Kohal - , Universitätsklinikum Freiburg (Autor:in)
  • Ralph G Luthardt - , Universitätsklinikum Ulm (Autor:in)
  • Nadine Frfr V Maltzahn - , Leibniz Universität Hannover (LUH) (Autor:in)
  • Michael Rädel - , Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Autor:in)
  • Daniel R Reissmann - , Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE) (Autor:in)
  • Franz Sebastian Schwindling - , Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg (Autor:in)
  • Stefan Wolfart - , Universitätsklinikum Aachen (Autor:in)
  • Nicole Passia - , Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (CAU), Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck (Autor:in)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted to investigate whether the loading protocol of single dental implants placed in the midline of edentulous mandibles will influence the implant survival or prosthetic maintenance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 158 patients were randomly assigned either to the immediate loading group (n = 81) or to the delayed loading group (n = 77). All implants were loaded with an overdenture retained by a ball attachment.

RESULTS: After 5 years, 102 patients attended the follow-up investigation. Immediately loaded single implants in the midline of the edentulous mandible revealed a statistically significant lower survival rate than implants loaded conventionally over an observation period of 5 years. In the immediate loading group, 9 implants failed within the first three months of implant loading. No further implant loss was recorded for this group. Two implants failed in the delayed loading group, whereas one implant had to be removed during second-stage surgery and the second five years after implant loading. Non-inferiority of the survival rate of the midline implant of the immediate loading group, compared with the delayed loading group, could not be shown (p = .79, CI immediate loading: 74.9%; 100.0%, CI delayed loading: 73.0%; 100.0%). The observed difference in implant survival between the two treatment groups over time was statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study indicate that immediate loading of a single mandibular implant in the edentulous mandible should be considered only in exceptional cases.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)212-221
Seitenumfang10
FachzeitschriftClinical oral implants research
Jahrgang32
Ausgabenummer2
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Feb. 2021
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

Scopus 85098054164
ORCID /0000-0002-3548-9462/work/142247457
ORCID /0000-0001-5859-2318/work/142254191

Schlagworte

Schlagwörter

  • Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Denture, Overlay, Humans, Immediate Dental Implant Loading, Jaw, Edentulous/surgery, Mandible/surgery, Treatment Outcome